In the absence of justice, what is sovereignty but organized robbery?

Friday, November 20, 2009

What does Israel have against a Palestinian stadium?

A friendly game between an Arab soccer team and a Palestinian team was supposed to inaugurate the new stadium being built in the eastern part of Al-Bireh, near Ramallah, at the end of the year. "Supposed to" because the Civil Administration, an arm of the Defense Ministry, has ordered that the work be halted and is threatening demolition.

FIFA, the international soccer federation, financed the stadium as part of a larger program to promote Palestinian soccer. The stadium covers 11 dunams (2.75 acres) and will hold 8,000 seats. An Israeli contractor, in partnership with a Dutch company and a Palestinian subcontractor, constructed the field.

In October 2008, when the field was ready, FIFA president Joseph Blatter and Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad laid the cornerstone for the stadium. The governments of France and Germany are paying for the construction of stands. The outer wall, the lighting and the scoreboard are being financed by the Al-Bireh municipality, which owns the land and within whose jurisdiction the stadium is located.

In 1973, the municipality submitted for the approval of the IDF a detailed plan for the area where the stadium is now located. It received final approval from Israel's National Planning and Building Council and Supreme Planning Council in 1981. Nevertheless, on October 11 of this year, Israeli soldiers and representatives of the Civil Administration showed up at the site. They arrived via the neighboring Jewish settlement of Psagot, which overlooks Palestinian neighborhoods and was built on Al-Bireh land. They delivered a stop-work order from the administration to one of the workers (whose name was handwritten, in Hebrew, on it).

On November 1, the municipality received a "final" stop-work order - addressed anonymously to "the holder," from "the Supreme Planning Council's building inspection subcommittee," and issued by "Assaf."

The document claims that work on the stadium's stands is being carried out "without a license," and contains other standard admonitions: "You were given an opportunity to appear before the inspection subcommittee to state your case. The subcommittee has concluded that the aforementioned work was carried out without proper permission ... You are hereby obligated, in accordance with section .... of the 1966 City, Village and Buildings Planning Law, to cease activity upon and use of said land, and to raze the building ... and to restore the location to its previous state within 7 days ... If you do not act as required, all legal means will be taken against you, including demolition of the structure and any means required to restore the situation to its prior state, at your expense."

A German source has told Haaretz: "This could become a major diplomatic issue between Germany and Israel. Just imagine: A German-financed project being torn down. It would definitely be a political scandal."

Blots on the landscape

Why is the Civil Administration concerned with a soccer stadium located within Al-Bireh's municipal boundaries, which the IDF itself approved nearly 30 years ago?

It emerges that some of the land in question, which the municipality designated for a school and other public buildings in the early 1970s, had the misfortune to later be defined as being in Area C (see box). Amid the 11,000 dunams (2,750 acres) that fall within the city's bounds, there are several such Area C "blotches" - for the most part, in areas close to where the settlements of Psagot and Beit El, as well as IDF and Civil Administration bases, were built, on the lands of Al-Bireh and Ramallah. The headquarters of Jawal (the Palestinian cell-phone company) is located in Area C, as is the house of Dr. Samih Al-Abed, who heads the Palestinian team at the territory and border negotiation committee. Even part of the residence of PA President Mahmoud Abbas is in Area C.

The Al-Bireh municipality has not, however, received any maps from Israel demarcating the exact location of the parts of the town defined as Area C. Their location has been surmised, based on the tabu (Land Registry) documents submitted to the municipality, as per the 1995 Israeli-Palestinian interim agreement: The lots for which the Civil Administration did not submit documents to the city are understood to belong to Area C. But Area C is not a planning designation, per se.

"[It is] a political designation, which was supposed to be temporary - to last just 18 months," explained Al-Abed, an architect and city planner, and a former senior official in the Palestinian Planning Ministry.

"It is unjust, unreasonable and unfair to have to request and to wait for an Israeli license to build within the blotches of Area C that are within approved and recognized municipal areas," he said this week, pointing out that, "It is Al-Bireh that provides all services to the citizenry, including those bits of Area C that are in the municipal area: cleaning, garbage collection, maintenance, renovations, construction."

Musa Jwayyed, the Al-Bireh city engineer, says that over the years, various structures have been built in areas within the municipal borders that are apparently part of Area C, and that the city has also carried out the necessary infrastructure work in those areas, including preparation of a sewerage network, and the paving of roads and sidewalks - without requesting licenses from the Civil Administration.

Jwayyed: "Al-Bireh has another 18,000 dunams [4,500 acres] outside the municipal boundaries. Settlements sit on some of them, and the rest are private lands or our own land reserves. There I know I must have Israeli approval and coordination: such as for the renovation of the slaughterhouse, for reaching the municipal garbage-disposal site, for construction of a water-purification plant. But the stadium is located within the municipal boundaries that the IDF approved."

The question is: Why, all of a sudden, more than three years after construction of the entire project began and 10 months after construction of the stands started, has the Civil Administration decided to halt the work?

Ziv Nishri, the Israeli contractor who built the field, said in a telephone conversation: "The army knew about the project because it's impossible to do anything without the Civil Administration's approval. FIFA is the body dealing with the foreign minister. Without the umbrella of the Foreign Ministry, the army and the Civil Administration, nothing would be happening here."

When Nishri heard about the stop-work order this week, he was very surprised. "The plans for the stands are at least two years old. Even before we started on the project, I had the general plans for the stands, because we designed the field to fit them."

Officials at Al-Bireh city hall see a connection between the stop-work order, and the Palestinian refusal to return to the negotiating table as long as Israel does not freeze construction in the settlements, as well as the recent announcement by Prime Minister Fayyad of the planned consolidation of various Palestinian state institutions. The officials and local activists agree with Samih al-Abed when he says: "This is a typical kind of Israeli pressure, which means: 'Either you go back to negotiations or we'll punish you. We'll do whatever we can to upset your lives.'"

The coordinator of government activities in the territories responded to Haaretz: "Recently, there have been meetings and discussions between representatives of the Civil Administration and Palestinians at the very highest level, with the goal of resolving the issue of the construction of the Al-Bireh stadium. This has been in the wake of the official measures taken against the construction that was undertaken without the proper permits and in an illegal location. The Civil Administration is working with the civil-affairs ministry of the Palestinian Authority to prepare and submit an amendment to the existing zoning plan, and following that, the possibility of a permit, in principal, for the continuation of construction will be considered."

Source:

Read more...

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Israeli army arrests Palestinian woman for refusing to strip


Hebron – Ma’an – A woman who refused to remove her clothes in front of Israeli soldiers at a checkpoint in Hebron was detained and taken to an Israeli prison facility Tuesday afternoon, local sources said.

Umm Wisam Dovch approached the Martyrs street checkpoint in central Hebron, and was asked to remove layers of her clothing so soldiers could search her person after she passed through metal detectors at the military post. When the middle-age woman refused to remove her clothing she was struck several times by one of the soldiers and forced into a military vehicle.

The woman was at the checkpoint on her way home to Tel Ar-Rumeda, south west of the Old City. The street is closed to Palestinian vehicles and residents must pass two Israeli checkpoints and several trailers settler families whenever they leave or return to their homes.

Israeli media sources reported that the woman was suspected to be concealing a weapon in the shoulder of her coat.

Source:

Read more...

EU: Settlement activity in East Jerusalem threatens two-state solution

The European Union on Wednesday joined the chorus of international criticism of an Israeli plan to build hundreds of new housing units in East Jerusalem, saying the move hampered talks over the establishment of a Palestinian state.

"The Presidency recalls that settlement activities, house demolitions and evictions in East Jerusalem are illegal under international law," the Swedish Presidency of the EU said in a statement.

"Such activities also prejudge the outcome of final status negotiations and threaten the viability of a two-state solution."

The EU statement echoed language used on Tuesday by the White House, which said it was "dismayed" by the move.

"The Presidency of the European Union is dismayed by the recent decision on the expansion of the settlement of Gilo," said the statement, referring to the Jerusalem neighborhood where Israel decided on Tuesday to build 900 new homes.

The EU presidency added that if there were to be genuine peace, a way must be found to resolve the status of Jerusalem as the future capital of two states.

Obama: Expanding settlements won't make Israel safer

The statement came shortly after U.S. President Barack Obama on Wednesday said the move complicated efforts by his administration to relaunch peace talks and embitters the Palestinians.

Obama told Fox News in an interview Wednesday that additional settlement building doesn't make Israel safer. He said such moves make it harder to achieve peace in the region, and embitters the Palestinians in a way that he said could be very dangerous.

"The situation in the Middle East is very difficult, and I've said repeatedly and I'll say again, Israel's security is a vital national interest to the United States, and we will make sure they are secure," Obama said in the interview.

Obama and the Palestinians have demanded that Israel halt settlement construction.

An aide to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday dismissed U.S. anger at Israel's approval for new homes in a settlement near Jerusalem.

Netanyahu's aide also sent reporters a message calling the building plan "a routine process." He said Netanyahu does not normally review municipal building plans and saw Gilo as "an integral part of Jerusalem."

"Construction in Gilo has taken place regularly for dozens of years and there is nothing new about the current planning and construction," the aide added.

Netanyahu seemed keen to contain the fresh dispute with Washington over settlements, ordering cabinet ministers to show restraint after the White House criticized the plan.

An official said the order went out after a deputy minister was quoted by an Israeli news website as accusing the United States of "behaving like a bull in a china shop" for objecting to the building plan for an area in the West Bank that Israel sees as part of Jerusalem.

Publication of the government commission's blueprint for Gilo on Tuesday drew sharp rebukes from the Palestinians, joined by Washington, Europe and the United Nations.

Abbas aide: Plan destroys chances for peace

Nabil Abu Rdaineh, aide to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, condemned the building plan, saying it "destroys the last chances for the peace process."

Abbas has said peace talks could resume only if settlement building stopped, a demand rejected by the United States which has echoed Israel in calling for negotiations, suspended for nearly a year, to start without preconditions.

Palestinian peace negotiator Saeb Erekat told an Israeli radio station on Wednesday that Netanyahu "has the choice - settlements or peace," and accused Israel of trying to decide the conflict by building instead of at the negotiating table.

French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, visiting Jerusalem, said France regretted Israel's decision.

Housing Minister Ariel Attias, trying to minimize the plan's significance, called it a "technical" matter, telling Army Radio it could be a year or more before building began.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement "at a time when we are working to relaunch negotiations, these actions make it more difficult for our efforts to succeed."

The United States also objected to continued evictions and the demolition of Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem, he said.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon also deplored the Israeli move, spokesman Farhan Haq said. Ban "believes that such actions undermine efforts for peace and cast doubt on the viability of the two-state solution" for Israelis and Palestinians, he said.

Netanyahu has said he would avoid expanding existing settlements, but rejects demands to stop building in Jerusalem.

Gilo, where some 40,000 Israelis live, was built on West Bank land Israel captured in the 1967 Six-Day War and later annexed as part of Jerusalem.

Some 500,000 Jews live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, also captured in 1967, among 2.7 million Palestinians

Source:

Read more...

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

US raps Israeli settlement plan

The United States has voiced its "dismay" over Israel's approval of 900 additional housing units at a Jewish settlement in East Jerusalem.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the move makes it "more difficult" to revive Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

He was speaking shortly after planning applications for the new units had been approved by Israel's interior ministry.

The planning and construction committee authorised the expansion of Gilo, which is built on land captured in 1967.

The land was later annexed to the Jerusalem municipality.

With the project yet to be reviewed, the public can still make objections.

Settlements on occupied territory are considered illegal under international law, though Israel disputes this.

It is the second time in two months that the Obama administration has spoken out on settlements.

In September the White House said it regretted reports that Israel planned to approve new construction in the West Bank.

The BBC's Paul Adams in Washington says the conventional wisdom in the US is that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has successfully thwarted Barack Obama's first foray into the stalled Middle East peace process, rebuffing American calls for a complete settlements freeze.

But some Washington observers say it's too early to write off the president's efforts, he says.

They believe Mr Obama is playing a long game and that the frosty relations between Mr Netanyahu and the White House could cause problems for the Israeli leader in the future, our correspondent adds.

'Israel's capital'

Israeli media reported earlier that the government had rejected a request from Washington to freeze the construction work at Gilo.

Mr Obama's Middle East envoy, George Mitchell, is said to have made the request to Mr Netanyahu at a meeting in London on Monday.

Mr Netanyahu replied that the project did not require government approval and that Gilo was "an integral part of Jerusalem", according to Israel Army Radio.

His spokesman, Mark Regev, declined to comment on the reports, but repeated Israel's refusal to include areas annexed to Jerusalem as part of any accommodation of Mr Obama's call for "restraint" in settlement construction.

"Prime Minister Netanyahu... is willing to adopt the policy of the greatest possible restraint concerning growth in the West Bank, but this applies to the West Bank," he told the Reuters news agency. "Jerusalem is Israel's capital and will remain as such."

Palestinian anger

The Palestinian Authority has demanded a halt to all settlement construction before it will attend new peace talks, which were suspended last year.

Mr Gibbs said: "We are dismayed at the Jerusalem Planning Committee's decision to move forward on the approval process for the expansion of Gilo in Jerusalem.

"Neither party should engage in efforts or take actions that could unilaterally pre-empt, or appear to pre-empt, negotiations."

America's position, he added, was that the status of Jerusalem must be resolved "through negotiations between the parties".

The BBC's Tim Franks in Jerusalem says Tuesday's announcement represents by far the largest batch of planning approvals for building on occupied territory since Mr Netanyahu became prime minister.

The 900 housing units, which will be built in the form of four-to-five-bedroom apartments, will account for a significant expansion of Gilo. The interior ministry said construction work would be unlikely to start for another three or four years, once the plans gained final authorisation.

A spokesman for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said the planning approval was "yet another step that shows and proves Israel is not ready for peace".

"This step will ruin every single attempt - European or American - to preserve the peace process," Nabil Abu Rudeineh said.

Israel's Peace Now movement, which opposes Jewish settlement activity, said Mr Netanyahu was "showing again that he is spoiling any chance to start negotiations by continuing to create new provocations in Jerusalem".

"This development is intended to torpedo progress that is taking place between US and Palestinians and Israelis on renewing the talks," said Peace Now's Hagit Ofran.

Nearly 500,000 Jews live in more than 100 settlements built on occupied territory in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Source:

Read more...

Reporter Helen Thomas criticizes Obama's Mideast peace efforts

Veteran White House correspondent, 89, believes U.S. hasn't done enough to advance Mideast peace.

On her 89th birthday, Hearst Newspapers columnist and veteran reporter Helen Thomas received a tray of cupcakes and personal congratulations from U.S. President Barack Obama in the White House briefing room.

But it seems that the veteran reporter, who covered every U.S. president since John F. Kennedy, requires from the Obama administration more than personal attention and cupcakes. Under Obama, Thomas says, the U.S. has not done enough to advance Middle East peace.

"I don't think they are working very hard for peace," she told Haaretz in an interview. "It's quite neglected because of Afghanistan and Iraq and the healthcare. It was right to push for a total settlements freeze, and it's wrong for President Obama to say there is no longer ban on settlements until they start negotiations - then what you get is [a] fait accompli. I don't think Obama should have caved on that."

She also criticizes the previous Administration's refusal to recognize the results of elections in Gaza in which Hamas had the upper hand.
"They've spread the word how they wanted democracy in the Middle East - but the moment Hamas won fairly, which every international observer said, including [former U.S. President Jimmy] Carter (I know he's not very popular in Israel, but he is an honest man) - they cut aid. How hypocritical can you get?"

And the fact that the United States considers Hamas a terrorist organization does not bother her.

"I think you can call anybody terrorist organization when they are in opposition - it's very loosely held word," she says. "I think people in Palestine are fighting for their land. Little by little, incursions and kicking people from their homes - who on earth would ever accept that without a fight? No American would and probably no Israeli would either. But I wouldn't give up on peace: I thought it was impossible with Begin, but something happened. Nothing is impossible. People want peace, and we should never stop trying."

The veteran White House Press Corps member has criticized Israel's policies towards the Palestinians for years.

"I've been to Israel several times with Carter and other presidents," she says. "I think the average Israeli is very fine, very fair and straightforward. But I think their treatment of the Palestinians in Jerusalem, where they continue to take their land, is wrong. It would be wrong in France, it would be wrong anywhere in the world. No one would accept that; I wouldn't. We've been always involved, and American Zionists certainly expect us to back up anything Israel does. I don't know if it is where the average American really wants us to be, but we have been there from the beginning, and I think both sides do want our intervention?.

Obama, she says, has yet to earn his Nobel Prize.

"I didn't think he deserved it yet. I think it's something he has to work for. He has to live up to it now for sure. I think it was a message - work for peace."

Thomas also believes that the Obama administration still has much to learn about the importance of its choices, but she denies being out to get its officials.

"My mission in life is to make them miserable? No," she laughs. "Actually, I think they are trying hard, and I think their hearts are in the right place. But there is no such thing as an instant president, they all have to learn. And we have to learn too, over and over again.

"I think Obama's people still don't fully understand how important every decision is. They think they have time, but they don't have that much time. I was in that press room all through the Vietnam War, and everything seems like déjà-vu all over again. I thought we'd learned that lesson of interventionism in places where people were determined to fight for their own country."

Obama has been reconsidering the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan for more than nine months; Thomas, however, thinks there is not much about which to ponder.

"He should get out. We should get out of there. You can have blue helmets to try to stabilize the situation - and get out. It became pointless, with no purpose, no mission, it's just to be there and be killed and killed. I do believe that Taliban are terrible, but I don't believe that if we don't go there, they'll all come here. I think that people need to overthrow their own tyrants."

Recently, Thomas co-authored with Craig Crawford her fifth book, "Listen Up, Mr. President: Everything You Always Wanted Your President to Know and Do." Along with plenty of historical anecdotes and personal observations, Thomas offers some advice to future presidents. She also mentions that decades at the briefing room did not help her make friends there.

"They all hate me, but no one went to this business to be liked," she says. "If you're their friend, you can't ask them [the] questions that we are asking. Besides, these are all new administrations, they start fresh every time. I think what's really wrong - the moment the president and his people step into the White House they become very secretive.

"Information that in my opinion belongs in the public domain suddenly becomes their private preserved information. They cover in walls everything. In the age of the Internet, we are certainly getting more information, no question about it - but what kind of information? That's the problem."

No one is flawless for Thomas, not even her colleagues at the White House.

"Press corps members are asking tougher questions now, but they didn't ask any tough questions ahead of the Iraqi war," she says.

"No one asked: 'Why?' And the very fact that everything was based on false facts, and nobody called their head, was shocking. People should always ask their governments 'Why?' and see if it's acceptable, why they are asking you to give your life and your family and destroy the country. People should get involved and should care."

The White House press corps grew over the years, but she also witnessed the decline of many newspapers, many of which recently closed their Washington bureaus.

"I love newspapers, and I don't want them to go out of existence. Today everybody with a laptop thinks he is a journalist and everybody with a cell phone thinks he is a photographer. It is not edited, they can say anything, they can ruin lives and reputations just by throwing it to the wind. It's a democracy, but it's important to have editors to say: 'Look, you are not a prosecutor.' I think there are big changes, and you cry when a newspaper goes down and so many have.

"But I think we'll always have an informed people and information that is fair; people deserve to read news. There is, of course, a lot of interpretation, a lot of opinion. I myself now write an opinion column - but for 57 years I wrote for UPI, where if a mother said she loves you, you had to check it out. It was about facts, and even if you cared for human race you couldn't put it in your copy."

Now Thomas can admit that over the years, she had her own sympathies.

"I thought Kennedy was the best, he is my favorite," she says. "He was very inspiring. He created the peace corps, signed the first nuclear test ban treaty and he said we are going to land man on the moon. He had great goals, told young people to go into public service. I though Johnson was great on domestic side. In the first two years in office he went through Medicare, civil rights act, public aid to education, environmental laws; he was sensational. But Vietnam brought him down."

Thomas, who was one of 9 siblings born to a family of illiterate Christian immigrants from Syria, thinks of herself as an American woman. "I was born here," she says.

And with regard to her fight to get to the top of the profession, she willingly shares credit.

"There were many, many women trying to find an equality in a journalism when the whole market for journalists was men's world. National Press Club - which was for the men alone. Each time we had to break down barriers, but I certainly didn't do it alone. It was determination; I don't like inequality and injustice. Outrage, that's what keeps me moving; anger at injustice. Actually a lot changed - it is very slow, but I think mankind does move to have a better world. I truly believe that.

"But sometimes progress is slow, and you have great setbacks. But we are our brother's keeper, we should be helping one another. We shouldn't have 47 million people in the U.S. who are uninsured because they have no jobs or are not eligible for it. Medicare for everyone, that's what we should have. I think Obama's legislation is a step in the right direction. But he could be more tough on it."

Sometimes her long exchanges with the White House spokesman, Robert Gibbs, exhaust other reporters.

"Well, you always wonder if you should have rephrase the question or ask it differently or ask much more important question," she admits. "Always Monday morning you think: 'Why did I ask it that way?' But I love the fact that we can question the president and put him on a spot, we should do it more often, it's very important to ask: 'Why.'

"I feel very privileged to hold this job for so long, because everything comes to the White House. Trivial things, and war and peace issues. Everything that [the] White House has done affects everyone in America and maybe in the world. So I feel very privileged to cover history every day. I love my work and I'd like to do it as long as I can. It keeps me involved, and I've been lucky so far."

Source:

Read more...

U.S. 'dismayed' at Israel plan to build 900 homes beyond Green Line

Israel disregards specific U.S. objection, approves plan to expand Jerusalem's Gilo neighborhood.

The White House responded angrily Tuesday to Israel's plan to build 900 new housing units beyond the Green Line in Jerusalem, despite specific objections from the U.S., saying that "we are dismayed."

In a statement, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs voiced the U.S.'s disappointment with "the Jerusalem Planning Committee's decision to move forward on the approval process for the expansion of Gilo in Jerusalem."

The Jerusalem municipal planning committee approved the construction plan Tuesday despite an expose in Israel's Yedioth Aharonot newspaper earlier in the day revealing that the U.S. has specifically objected to the construction outlined in the plan.

"At a time when we are working to relaunch negotiations," the White House spokesman went on to say, "these actions make it more difficult for our efforts to succeed. Neither party should engage in efforts or take actions that could unilaterally pre-empt, or appear to pre-empt, negotiations."

"The U.S. also objects to other Israeli practices in Jerusalem related to housing, including the continuing pattern of evictions and demolitions of Palestinian homes," the statement continued.

"Our position is clear: the status of Jerusalem is a permanent status issue that must be resolved through negotiations between the parties," he added.

State Department Spokesman Ian Kelly also voiced disapproval, saying "we understand the Israeli point of view about Jerusalem but we think all sides right now should refrain from these actions. We're calling on both parties to refrain from action and from rhetoric that would impede this process. It's a challenging time and we need to focus on what's important."

The plan - named "Gilo's western slopes" - will account for a significant expansion of the neighborhood. The planned 900 housing unites will be built in the form of 4-5 bedroom apartments, in an effort to lure relatively well-off residents.

The plan was initiated by the Israel Land Administration, and has received an initial green light, but on Tuesday the authorization was finalized.

The additional housing units are only part of the planned expansion of Gilo. In fact, the majority of apartments slated to be built in Jerusalem in the coming years will be located in Gilo. Other building plans in various stages of approval include some 4,000 new housing units in Gilo and adjacent areas.

According to sources in the planning committee, extensive building plans stem from the scrapping of the Safdie plan, which would have seen the city expand westward. The Safdie plan, named after architect Moshe Safdie, included over 20,000 housing units on open areas covering 26,600 dunams (some 6,600 acres) west of the city on natural and planted forests near Ramot. The plan had come under attack by environmental groups, and was later discarded.

According to the sources, this created a need for new land for construction, which can be found in the southern parts of the city and beyond the Green Line.

The chairman of the Gilo community administration, Moshe Ben Shushan, voiced amazement at the American disapproval, saying "this is a trend of interference in Israel's policies. I have never thought of Gilo as a settlement."

Senior Palestinian official Saeb Erekat said Tuesday that there was no point in negotiating while Israel expands Jewish neighborhoods in the part of Jerusalem the Palestinians want for their capital.

He said the Israeli move shows that it is meaningless to resume negotiations.

Over recent days, American officials have shown a tremendous amount of interest in the construction plans, and have even approached left-wing activists for information.

Source:

Read more...

  © Blogger templates ProBlogger Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP